Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of lig4Δ, exo1Δ, rad1Δ, pol32 Δ and yen1 Δ mutations on the accumulation of GCRs in checkpoint-proficient and checkpoint-deficient sgs1 Δ mutants

From: Differential genetic interactions between Sgs1, DNA-damage checkpoint components and DNA repair factors in the maintenance of chromosome stability

Relevant genotypea

GCR rateb

95% CIc

wildtype

1.1

< 1-6.2

exo1

24

7-79

sgs1

220

144-276

sgs1 mec3

1297

1120-2030

exo1 sgs1

43800

30400-186000

exo1 mec3

30

12-39

exo1 mec3 sgs1

1168498

549530-3251000

sgs1 mec3 exo1 lig4

895988

701149-1236740

lig4

16

ND

sgs1 lig4

80

35-254

sgs1 mec3 lig4

1335

948-2140

yen1

< 5

< 4-6

sgs1 yen1

81

57-265

sgs1 mec3 yen1

1089

254-2540

pol32

20

15-26

sgs1 pol32

25

< 24-105

sgs1 mec3 pol32

2317

1800-3110

rad1

10

< 9-23

sgs1 rad1

63

25-356

sgs1 mec3 rad1

1173

1020-1540

  1. a Strains with multiple gene deletions were constructed by sporulation of the appropriate heterozygous diploids. GCR rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for wildtype [81], sgs1 [82], sgs1 mec3 [60] and lig4 [1] were reported previously and are included for comparison. Spores with both sgs1Δ and pol32Δ mutations grew very slowly and exhibited a low viable cell count on YPD in the GCR assay.
  2. b The rate of accumulating gross-chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) is calculated by selecting for cells resistant to canavanine (Canr) and 5-fluoro-orotic acid (5-FOAr) and is expressed as Canr 5-FOAr × 10-10 [77].
  3. c 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median GCR rates were calculated according to Nair [80].